Comparison between the Different Types of Tendon Grafts in Reconstructive Surgery
Main Article Content
Abstract
Tendon grafts play a crucial role in reconstructive surgery, restoring function and stability to damaged tendons. This literature review examines the theoretical framework, surgical treatment, and potential complications associated with different types of tendon grafts. Autografts, harvested from the patient's own body, are considered the gold standard due to their biocompatibility and better integration. Allografts and synthetic grafts offer alternatives, eliminating donor site morbidity and providing consistent biomechanical properties. However, considerations include the risk of graft rejection and inferior mechanical performance. The selection of the most suitable graft should be tailored to individual patient needs, optimizing functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. Advances in graft technology continue to shape the landscape of reconstructive surgery, further enhancing patient outcomes and quality of life.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Yasuda, K., Kondo, E., Ichiyama, H., Tanabe, Y., & Tohyama, H. (2006). Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 22(3), 240-251.
II. Krych, A. J., Jackson, J. D., Hoskin, T. L., & Dahm, D. L. (2008). A meta-analysis of patellar tendon autograft versus patellar tendon allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 24(3), 292-298.
III. Laxdal, G., Kartus, J., Eriksson, B. I., Faxen, E., Sernert, N., & Karlsson, J. (2006). Biodegradable and metallic interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery using hamstring tendon grafts: prospective randomized study of radiographic results and clinical outcome. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 34(10), 1574-1580.
IV. Milano, G., Mulas, P. D., Ziranu, F., Piras, S., Manunta, A., & Fabbriciani, C. (2006). Comparison between different femoral fixation devices for ACL reconstruction with doubled hamstring tendon graft: a biomechanical analysis. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 22(6), 660-668.
V. Yasuda, K., Kondo, E., Ichiyama, H., Kitamura, N., Tanabe, Y., Tohyama, H., & Minami, A. (2004). Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 20(10), 1015-1025.
VI. Barenius, B., Nordlander, M., Ponzer, S., Tidermark, J., & Eriksson, K. (2010). Quality of life and clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon graft or quadrupled semitendinosus graft: an 8-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. The American journal of sports medicine, 38(8), 1533-1541.