Debunking Old Beliefs: Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Pregnancy
Main Article Content
Abstract
Pregnancy is a state associated with an increased risk of lithogenesis on the gallbladder. Cholelithiasis during pregnancy has an incidence of 12%, with pregnancy being an important risk factor for gallstones. The delayed endoscopic intervention has been associated with an increased risk of adverse events. Using the resource of ERCP in pregnancy is valuable in diseases of the biliary tract. The use of measures to reduce exposure to radiation should be the norm and the delay of this procedure should not be carried out when there are precise indications for it.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Neuhaus H. Choledocholithiasis in pregnancy: When and how to perform ERCP? Endosc Int Open. 2020;8(10):E1508-E1510. doi:10.1055/A-1196-1683
II. Magno-Pereira V, Moutinho-Ribeiro P, Macedo G. Demystifying endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017; 219:35-39. doi:10.1016/J.EJOGRB.2017.10.008
III. Chan CHY, Enns RA. ERCP in the management of choledocholithiasis in pregnancy. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2012;14(6):504-510. doi:10.1007/S11894-012-0294-0
IV. Celaj S, Kourkoumpetis T. Gallstones in Pregnancy. JAMA.2021;325(23):2410. doi:10.1001/JAMA.2021.4502
V. Azab M, Bharadwaj S, Jayaraj M, et al. Safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(6):341-354. doi:10.4103/SJG.SJG_92_19
VI. Kamani L, Achakzai MS, Ismail FW, Kayani F. Safety of Endoscopy and Its Outcome in Pregnancy. Cureus. 2019;11(12). doi:10.7759/CUREUS.6301
VII. Tang Q, Zhang K. Is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography safe during pregnancy? Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(1):61-62. doi:10.4103/SJG.SJG_624_19
VIII. Robbins R, Qureshi WA. ERCP and elective cholecystectomy are safe in pregnant patients with acute biliary pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89(6):1178-1179. doi:10.1016/J.GIE.2019.02.017
IX. Konduk BT, Bayraktar O. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in pregnancy: A high-volume study with long-term follow-up. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019;30(9):811-816. doi:10.5152/TJG.2019.18799
X. Rampersad FS, Chan A, Persaud S, Maharaj P, Maharaj R. Choledocholithiasis in Pregnancy: A Case Report. Cureus. 2022;14(2). doi:10.7759/CUREUS.22610
XI. Laudanno O, Garrido J, Ahumarán G, Gollo P, Khoury M. Long-term follow-up after fetal radiation exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endosc Int Open. 2020;8(12):E1909-E1914. doi:10.1055/A-1293-7783
XII. Cappell MS, Stavropoulos SN, Friedel D. Systematic review of safety and efficacy of therapeutic endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography during pregnancy including studies of radiation-free therapeutic endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;10(10):308-321. doi:10.4253/WJGE.V10.I10.308
XIII. Yang J, Zhang X, Zhang X. Therapeutic efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography among pregnant women with severe acute biliary pancreatitis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23(5):437-440. doi:10.1089/lap.2012.0497
XIV. Arce-Liévano E, del Río-Suárez I, Valenzuela-Salazar C, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography results for the treatment of symptomatic choledocholithiasis in pregnant patients: A recent experience at a secondary care hospital in Mexico City. Revista de gastroenterologia de Mexico (English). 2021;86(1):21-27. doi:10.1016/J.RGMX.2019.12.001
XV. Brewer Gutierrez OI, Godoy Brewer G, Zulli C, et al. Multicenter experience with digital single-operator cholangioscopy in pregnant patients. Endosc Int Open. 2021;9(2):E116-E121. doi:10.1055/A-1320-0084
XVI. Luthra AK, Patel KP, Li F, et al. Endoscopic intervention and cholecystectomy in pregnant women with acute biliary pancreatitis decrease early readmissions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89(6): 1169-1177.e10. doi:10.1016/J.GIE.2018.11.026