Comparing Efficacy and Safety Aspects of 2% Lidocaine Hydrochloride Combination with 1:80.000 Added Epinephrine Solution versus the Most Commonly Used 2% Lidocaine Hydrochloride Solution in Surgical Procedures on Human Fingers and Toes
Main Article Content
Abstract
The effective management of pain and hemostasis is a pivotal concern in surgical procedures performed on human fingers and toes. The anatomical intricacies and limited tissue volume demand a meticulous approach to ensure both the safety of the patient and the successful outcome of the surgery. The use of vasoconstrictor agents, such as epinephrine, to provide clear surgical field and better surgical outcome further complicates the landscape. While epinephrine is a valuable adjunct to local anesthesia due to its hemostatic properties and ability to prolong anesthetic effects, its application in procedures on fingers and toes necessitates a deep understanding of potential risks and complications. This literature review delves into the comparative analysis of two widely employed local anesthetic solutions which are the 2% lidocaine hydrochloride solution and the 2% lidocaine hydrochloride solution combined with 1:80,000 epinephrine, with specific aim to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety aspects of both local anesthetic solutions. Lidocaine solution alone offers effective pain relief with minimal systemic risks but might lack the extended duration and hemostasis benefits of epinephrine. The lidocaine-epinephrine combination solution provides prolonged anesthesia and reduced bleeding, but clinicians must balance these advantages with the potential for ischemic events and delayed wound healing. Close monitoring, precise dosing, and careful patient selection are paramount in ensuring successful outcomes while minimizing complications.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Beecham GB, Nessel TA, Goyal A. lidocaine. [Updated 2022 Dec 11]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539881/
II. Liu S, Carpenter RL, Chiu AA, McGill TJ, Mantell SA. epinephrine prolongs duration of subcutaneous infiltration of local anesthesia in a dose-related manner. Correlation with magnitude of vasoconstriction. Reg Anesth. 1995 Sep-Oct;20(5):378-84..
III. Moore PA, Hersh EV, Papas AS, Goodson JM, Yagiela JA, Rutherford B, Rogy S, Navalta L. Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine with epinephrine following local anesthesia reversal with phentolamine mesylate. Anesth Prog. 2008 Summer;55(2):40-8. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006(2008)55[40:POLWEF]2.0.CO;2.
IV. Dalal R, Grujic D. Epinephrine. [Updated 2023 May 1]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482160/
V. Lenkey N, Karoly R, Epresi N, et al. Binding of sodium channel inhibitors to hyperpolarized and depolarized conformations of the channel. Neuropharmacology 2011;60:191–200.
VI. Scholz A. Mechanisms of (local) anaesthetics on voltage-gated sodium and other ion channels. Br J Anaesth 2002;89:52–61.
VII. Gawali VS, Lukacs P, Cervenka R, et al. Mechanism of modification, by lidocaine, of fast and slow recovery from inactivation of voltage-gated Na(+) channels. Mol Pharmacol 2015;88:866–79.
VIII. Komai H, McDowell TS. Local anesthetic inhibition of voltage-activated potassium currents in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. Anesthesiology 2001;94:1089–95.
IX. Körner J, Albani S, Sudha Bhagavath Eswaran V, Roehl AB, Rossetti G, Lampert A. Sodium Channels and Local Anesthetics-Old Friends With New Perspectives. Front Pharmacol. 2022 Mar 28;13:837088. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.837088.
X. Becker DE, Reed KL. Local anesthetics: review of pharmacological considerations. Anesth Prog. 2012 Summer;59(2):90-101; quiz 102-3. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-59.2.90.
XI. Collins JB, Song J, Mahabir RC. Onset and duration of intradermal mixtures of bupivacaine and lidocaine with epinephrine. Can J Plast Surg. 2013 Spring;21(1):51-3. doi: 10.1177/229255031302100112. PMID: 24431939; PMCID: PMC3891109.
XII. Lidocaine dosage guide + max dose, adjustments. Drugs.com. (n.d.). https://www.drugs.com/dosage/lidocaine.html
XIII. Harness NG. Digital block anesthesia. J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Jan;34(1):142-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.10.010..
XIV. Wilhelmi BJ, Blackwell SJ, Miller JH, Mancoll JS, Dardano T, Tran A, et al. Do not use epinephrine in digital blocks: Myth or truth? Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2001;107(2):393–7. doi:10.1097/00006534-200102000-00014.
XV. Prasetyono TOH. Epinephrine one-per-mil tumescent solution in hand surgery: Review of experimental and clinical studies. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2021 Oct;40(5):554-559. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2021.04.013.
XVI. Hirshburg JM; Diven DG; Edmiston C, Dozier SE, Woody M, Fox MC. Safety of Intradermal/subcutaneous lidocaine with epinephrine use in dermatologic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2020 Jan;46(1):26-30. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001900.
XVII. Firoz B, Davis N, Goldberg LH. Local anesthesia using buffered 0.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine for tumors of the digits treated with Mohs micrographic surgery. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2009;61(4):639–43. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2009.07.005.
XVIII. Vinycomb TI, Sahhar LJ. Comparison of local anesthetics for digital nerve blocks: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Apr;39(4):744-751.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.01.017.
XIX. Jorkjend L, Skoglund LA. Infiltrated lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:80,000 causes more postoperative pain than lidocaine 2% after oral soft tissue surgery. Anesth Prog. 1999 Spring;46(2):71-6.