Beauty and the Rash: The Hidden Risks of Cosmetics in Contact Dermatitis
Main Article Content
Abstract
Contact dermatitis is an inflammatory condition of the skin that occurs when it comes into contact with specific substances or irritants. Cosmetics have been identified as a common cause of contact dermatitis. This research will review previous studies on the relationship between cosmetics and contact dermatitis. Research identifying the most common allergens and irritants present in cosmetic products will be analysed, as well as patch tests used to detect possible allergic reactions. The results of studies that have demonstrated the presence of allergens and irritants in cosmetics, as well as the associated skin reactions, will be presented. Contact dermatitis prevention and management strategies will also be discussed, including identification and avoidance of specific allergens, patch testing, and skin care guidelines. The discussion will focus on the importance of education for both consumers and healthcare professionals about the risks of cosmetics in contact dermatitis. In conclusion, cosmetics pose a hidden risk for the development of contact dermatitis. It is critical that both consumers and healthcare professionals are aware of the common allergens and irritants present in cosmetic products, and take appropriate steps to prevent and manage this condition.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Ho KK, Campbell KL, Lavergne SN. Contact dermatitis: a comparative and translational review of the literature. Vet Dermatol. 2015;26(5):314-327, e66-67. doi:10.1111/vde.12229
II. Remaut K, Thune P. [Occurrence of cosmetic allergy]. Tidsskr Den Nor Laegeforening Tidsskr Prakt Med Ny Raekke. 1992;112(10):1275-1277.
III. Bauer A. Contact dermatitis in the cleaning industry. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;13(5):521-524. doi:10.1097/ACI.0b013e328364ec21
IV. Soni BP, Sherertz EF. Contact dermatitis in the textile industry: a review of 72 patients. Am J Contact Dermat Off J Am Contact Dermat Soc. 1996;7(4):226-230.
V. Matthys E, Zahir A, Ehrlich A. Shoe allergic contact dermatitis. Dermat Contact Atopic Occup Drug. 2014;25(4):163-171. doi:10.1097/DER.0000000000000049
VI. Boonchai W, Thanomkitti K, Kasemsarn P. Occupational contact dermatitis in tertiary university hospital: a 5-year retrospective study. J Med Assoc Thail Chotmaihet Thangphaet. 2014;97(11):1182-1188.
VII. Loranger C, Moreau L, Sasseville D. Occupational Contact Dermatitis in the Canadian Aircraft Industry. Dermat Contact Atopic Occup Drug. 2018;29(3):139-150. doi:10.1097/DER.0000000000000361
VIII. Saary J, Qureshi R, Palda V, et al. A systematic review of contact dermatitis treatment and prevention. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53(5):845.
doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2005.04.075
IX. Goyal S, Sajid N, Husain S. Contact Dermatitis Due to Local Cosmetics: A Study from Northern India. Indian J Dermatol. 2019;64(6):461-464.
doi:10.4103/ijd.IJD_479_19
X. Held E, Johansen JD, Agner T, Menné T. Contact allergy to cosmetics: testing with patients’ own products. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;40(6):310-315. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06081.x
XI. de Groot AC, Bruynzeel DP, Bos JD, et al. The allergens in cosmetics. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124(10):1525-1529. doi:10.1001/archderm.124.10.1525
XII. Rastogi S, Patel KR, Singam V, Silverberg JI. Allergic contact dermatitis to personal care products and topical medications in adults with atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79(6):1028-1033.e6. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.07.017
XIII. Lee SS, Hong DK, Jeong NJ, et al. Multicenter study of preservative sensitivity in patients with suspected cosmetic contact dermatitis in Korea. J Dermatol. 2012;39(8):677-681.
doi:10.1111/j.1346-8138.2012.01551.x
XIV. García-Gavín J, Armario-Hita JC, Fernández-Redondo V, et al. [Epidemiology of contact dermatitis in Spain. Results of the Spanish Surveillance System on Contact Allergies for the year 2008]. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2011;102(2):98-105. doi:10.1016/j.ad.2010.10.015
XV. Zaragoza-Ninet V, Blasco Encinas R, Vilata-Corell JJ, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis due to cosmetics: A clinical and epidemiological study in a tertiary hospital. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2016;107(4):329-336. doi:10.1016/j.ad.2015.12.007
XVI. Trattner A, Slodownik D, Jbarah A, Ingber A. Questionnaire study of the prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis from cosmetics in Israel. Dermat Contact Atopic Occup Drug. 2009;20(5):284-286.
XVII. Adams RM, Maibach HI. A five-year study of cosmetic reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985;13(6):1062-1069.
doi:10.1016/s0190-9622(85)70258-7
XVIII. Eiermann HJ, Larsen W, Maibach HI, Taylor JS. Prospective study of cosmetic reactions: 1977-1980. North American Contact Dermatitis Group. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1982;6(5):909-917. doi:10.1016/s0190-9622(82)70080-5
XIX. Teo Y, McFadden JP, White IR, Lynch M, Banerjee P. Allergic contact dermatitis in atopic individuals: Results of a 30-year retrospective study. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;81(6):409-416.
doi:10.1111/cod.13363
XX. Hon KL, Leung AKC, Cheng JW, Luk DCK, Leung AS, Koh MJ. Allergic contact dermatitis in pediatric practice. Curr Pediatr Rev. Published online June 26, 2023.
doi:10.2174/1573396320666230626122135
XXI. Symanzik C, Weinert P, Babić Ž, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethyl cyanoacrylate contained in cosmetic glues among hairdressers and beauticians who perform nail treatments and eyelash extension as well as hair extension applications: A systematic review. Contact Dermatitis. 2022;86(6):480-492. doi:10.1111/cod.14056
XXII. Gambichler T, Boms S, Freitag M. Contact dermatitis and other skin conditions in instrumental musicians. BMC Dermatol. 2004;4:3.
doi:10.1186/1471-5945-4-3
XXIII. Dueñas L, Arnal-Gómez A, Aparicio I, et al. Influence of age, gender and obesity on pressure discomfort threshold of the foot: A cross-sectional study. Clin Biomech Bristol Avon. 2021;82:105252.
doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105252
XXIV. Feng JB, Ni JD, Yao X, et al. Gender and age influence on clinical and laboratory features in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: 1,790 cases. Rheumatol Int. 2010;30(8):1017-1023. doi:10.1007/s00296-009-1087-0
XXV. Warshaw EM, Buchholz HJ, Belsito DV, et al. Allergic patch test reactions associated with cosmetics: retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2001-2004. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60(1):23-38. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2008.07.056
XXVI. Duarte I, Lazzarini R, Kobata CM. Contact dermatitis in adolescents. Am J Contact Dermat Off J Am Contact Dermat Soc. 2003;14(4):200-202.
XXVII. Kumar P, Paulose R. Patch testing in suspected allergic contact dermatitis to cosmetics. Dermatol Res Pract. 2014;2014:695387.
doi:10.1155/2014/695387
XXVIII. Silva EA, Bosco MRM, Mozer E. Study of the frequency of allergens in cosmetics components in patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis. An Bras Dermatol. 2012;87(2):263-268.
doi:10.1590/s0365-05962012000200011