Comparing the Versatility of Anterolateral Thigh (ALT) Free Flap and Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator (SCIP) Free Flap for Hand Reconstruction Due to Electric Burn Injuries: Case-Based Literature Review
Main Article Content
Abstract
Electrical injuries, often caused by high-voltage currents from sources like arc flashes or ignited clothing, frequently result in extensive burns, particularly to the hands. The upper extremities, being common contact points for electrical injuries, are susceptible to severe tissue damage, including burns, nerve, muscle, and vascular damage. High-voltage electrical burns often require surgical intervention, with an emphasis on restoring both function and form. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two free flap techniques—Anterolateral Thigh (ALT) and Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator (SCIP)—in the reconstruction of hand burns resulting from electrical injuries.
Authors conducted a literature review based on cases from the burn unit at Pertamina Central Hospital, Jakarta, focusing on two patients who underwent reconstruction using the ALT and SCIP free flaps. The ALT free flap, characterized by its versatile and reliable tissue coverage, was utilized in one case, while the SCIP free flap, known for its thin and pliable tissue, was employed in the other. The study reviews the anatomy, advantages, and limitations of each flap, considering factors such as functional outcomes, aesthetic results, donor site morbidity, and surgical complexity. Both techniques were shown to offer significant benefits in reconstructing complex burn injuries, with the ALT flap providing robust coverage and the SCIP flap offering superior contour and functional outcomes for smaller defects.
The findings underscore the versatility of both flaps in electrical burn reconstruction, highlighting the importance of choosing the appropriate technique based on the size and location of the defect. This study contributes valuable insights into the selection of free flap techniques for reconstructing hand injuries caused by electrical burns, aiming to optimize patient outcomes in terms of both functionality and aesthetics.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Bounds EJ, Khan M, Kok SJ. Electrical Burns. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan– [updated 2023 Apr 24]. Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519514/
II. Culnan DM, Capek KD, Huang T, Lineaweaver W. Acute and reconstructive care of the burned hand. In: Total Burn Care. 5th ed. Elsevier; 2017. p. 589-608.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-47661-4.00054-X
III. Kim JS, Lee HH, Koh SH, Lee DC, Roh SY, Lee KJ. Hand reconstruction using anterolateral thigh free flap by terminal perforator-to-digital artery anastomosis: retrospective analysis. Arch Plast Surg. 2023;51(1):87-93.https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2161-7419
IV. Shih JG, Shahrokhi S, Jeschke MG. Review of adult electrical burn injury outcomes worldwide: an analysis of low-voltage vs high-voltage electrical injury. J Burn Care Res. 2017;38(1).
https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0000000000000373
V. Free anterolateral thigh flaps for upper extremity soft tissue reconstruction. Der freie ALT-Lappen: eine sichere Option zur Rekonstruktion von Weichteildefekten der oberen Extremität. (n.d.).
VI. Sn TT, Vit Dung PT, Nghĩa PT, Hng Thúy TT. Reconstruction of finger soft tissue defects with a thinned free anterolateral thigh flap. Ann Plast Surg. 2023;91(2):238-244. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000003612
VII. Whitehouse H. Comparison of thigh-based versus groin-based versus lateral-thoracic-based flaps for hand resurfacing: a review article. 2020.
https://doi.org/10.29252/wjps.10.3.3
VIII. Bullocks J, Naik B, Lee E, Hollier L. Flow-through flaps: a review of current knowledge and a novel classification system. Microsurgery.
;26(6):439-449. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20268
IX. Aghera BR, Karunakar P, Vijay Sylvester T. Study of lateral circumflex femoral artery. Int J Anat Res. 2014;4:617-637. https://doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2014.507
X. Lakhiani C, Lee MR, Saint-Cyr M. Vascular anatomy of the anterolateral thigh flap: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(6):1254-1268. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826d1662
XI. Kimura N, Satoh K, Hasumi T, et al. Clinical application of the free thin anterolateral thigh flap in 31 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1197-1208.
XII. Kimura N, Saitoh M, Okamura T, et al. Concept and anatomical basis of microdissected tailoring method for free flap transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:152-162.
XIII. Kimura N, Saito M, Sumiya Y, et al. Reconstruction of hand skin defects by microdissected mini anterolateral thigh perforator flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61:1073-1077.
XIV. Song CT, Bhogesha S, Chu S, Song C. Review of the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap: recommendations to the approach. Australas J Plast Surg. 2020;3(2):46-55.
https://doi.org/10.34239/ajops.v3n2.193
XV. Koshima I, Nanba Y, Tsutsui T, et al. Superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap for reconstruction of limb defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(1):233-240. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000095948.03605.20
XVI. Yoshimatsu H, Steinbacher J, Meng S, et al. Superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap: an anatomical study of the correlation of the superficial and the deep branches of the artery and evaluation of perfusion from the deep branch to the sartorius muscle and the iliac bone. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(2):589-602. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005282
XVII. Yoshimatsu H, Yamamoto T, Hayashi A, et al. Use of the transverse branch of the superficial circumflex iliac artery as a landmark facilitating identification and dissection of the deep branch of the superficial circumflex iliac artery for free flap pedicle: anatomical study and clinical applications. Microsurgery. 2019;39(8):721-729.
https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30518
XVIII. Li Z, Zheng D, Zheng J, et al. Free superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap with a single-pedicle bilobed design for pediatric multi-digit defect reconstruction. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01733-3
XIX. Sơn TT, Nghĩa PT, Dung PTV, Chiến VH, Thúy TTH, Trọng NH. Limitation of microdissected thinning in free anterolateral thigh flap for hand reconstruction. Eur J Plast Surg. 2024;47(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-023-02154-1
XX. Valbuena SE, Pereira EF, Conde BN. Superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap for the coverage of limb defects. Orthop Traumatol Serv Hosp El Cruce Alta Argentina. 2021;86(6):812-820.
https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.18527434.2021.86.6.1035
XXI. Hagiga A, Aly M, Kadhum M, Christopoulos G. Functional and aesthetic outcomes of the anterolateral thigh flap in reconstruction of upper limb defects: a systematic review. World J Plast Surg. 2022;11(3):13-23.
https://doi.org/10.52547/wjps.11.3.13
XXII. McNamara CT, Iorio ML, Greyson M. Concepts in soft-tissue reconstruction of the contracted hand and upper extremity after burn injury. Front Surg. 2023;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1118810
XXIII. Vizcay M, Pajardi GE, Zanchetta F, Stucchi S, Baez A, Troisi L. Tailored skin flaps for hand reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022;10(9). https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004538