A Reviewing Early Vs Later Reconstruction for Post-Mastectomy Cases
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the advantages and disadvantages of patients undergoing either immediate or delayed breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Methods: This review was compiled using information from numerous web databases. Scientific articles were selected based on the inclusion criteria. Data were collected, organized, and summarized. Results: Mastectomy or breast removal is frequently performed as part of breast cancer treatment. Psychological issues following a mastectomy may get better for some patients after breast reconstruction. The most common type is immediate reconstruction, which preferably uses a nipple-sparing or skin-sparing mastectomy and implant-based reconstruction (but can also be autologous reconstruction). Delayed reconstruction is often performed using autologous tissue flaps or implant-based using either the definitive implant or temporary expanders. Conclusion: Immediate reconstruction creates better cosmetic outcomes, shorter overall costs, quicker recovery, higher quality of life, and increases the psychological well-being of patients. Besides, delayed reconstruction is a beneficial option for post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) cases and reduced the incidence of postoperative complications than immediate reconstruction.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R.L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2021; 71: 209-49.
II. Pusat Data dan Informasi Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Beban Kanker di Indonesia [Internet]. Jakarta: Ministryof Health Republic of Indonesia; 2019 [25 November 2022]. Available from:
https://pusdatin.kemkes.go.id/resources/download/pusdatin/infodatin/Infodatin-Kanker-2019.pdf
III. Prates, A. C. L., Freitas-Junior, R., Prates, M. F. O., Veloso, M. F., Barros, N. M. Influence of Body Image in Women Undergoing Treatment for Breast Cancer. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia. 2017; 175-83.
IV. Milas, I., Zore, Z., Roth, A., Oreši´c, T., Eljuga, D., Gulan, M., et al. Breast Reconstruction. Oncology Library. 2014; 42: 29–35.
V. Othman, D. Immediate Versus Delayed Breast Reconstruction: A Literature Review and Analysis of Psychosocial Outcomes. 2017; 2 (1): 1-4.
VI. Goethals, A., Rose, J. Mastectomy. Statpearls [Internet]. [cited 2022Nov25]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538212/
VII. Jonczyk, M.M., Jean, J., Graham, R., Chatterjee, A. Surgical Trends in Breast Cancer: A Rise in Novel Operative Treatment Options Over a 12 Year Analysis. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 2019;173(2):267–74.
VIII. Gondhowiardjo, S., Soediro, R., Jayalie, V. F., Djoerban, Z., Siregar, N. C., Poetiray, E. D. C. Multicenter Management of Breast Cancer in Indonesia: Ten Years of Experience. 2020; 8 (2): 121-30.
IX. Lazaraviciute, G., Chaturvedi, S. Mastectomy—A Critical Review. Open Journal of Clinical Diagnostic. 2017; 7: 58-66.
X. Adesina, M. A., Olajire, T. I. Physical and Psychological Complications of Mastectomy: The Role of Physiotherapy. World News of Neutral Sciences. 2020; 29 (3): 212-24.
XI. Sukartini, T., Sari, Y. I. P. Women with Breast Chance Living with One Breast After a Mastectomy. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 2021; 12 (2): 366-75.
XII. Oadiel, Y. A., Al-Ba’adani, M. N., Haidar, Q. H. Early Complications Following Modified Radical Mastectomy. Open Access Library Journal. 2020; 7: 1-11.
XIII. Shaikh, F.B., Memon, A.A., Kumar, M., Soomro, E. Complications of Modified Radical Mastectomy in Carcinoma Breast Patients. Medical Channel. 2014; 20: 43-46.
XIV. Xiong, M., Liu, Z., Lv, W., Zhao, C., Wang, Y., Tan, Y., et al. Breast Reconstruction Does Not Affect the Survival of Patients with Breast Cancer Located in the Central and Nipple Portion: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database Analysis. Frontiers in Surgery. 2022; 9: 1-12.
XV. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2019 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report [Internet]. [cited 2022Nov27]. Available from: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2019/plastic-surgery-statistics-full-report-2019.pdf
XVI. Marco, G., Nicolo, B., Pio, G.M., Marianna, P., Francesco, S., Luigi, S., et al. Breast Reconstruction with Anatomical Implants: A Review of Indications and Techniques Based on Current Literature. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2017; 21: 2-29.
XVII. Nahabedian, M. Y. Current Approaches to Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery. 2018; 142: 871–80.
XVIII. Nealon, K.P., Weitzman, R.E., Sobti, N., Gadd, M., Specht, M., Jimenez, R. B., et al. Prepectoral Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction: Safety Outcome Endpoints and Delineation of Risk Factors. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery. 2020; 145:898–908.
XIX. Ter-Louw, R.P., Nahabedian, M.Y. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Plastic Reconstructive Surgery. 2017;1405: 51–9.
XX. Nahabedian, M.Y., Cocilovo, C. Two-stage Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison between Prepectoral and Partial Subpectoral Techniques. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery. 2017; 1406: 22–30.
XXI. Chao, A. H. Safe, and Efficient Implant-based Breast Reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery-Global Open. 2020; 8 (9): e3134.
XXII. Leitner, H. S., Pauzenberger, R., Ederer, I. A., Radtke, C., Hacker, S. BMI Specific Complications Following Implant-Based BreastReconstruction after Mastectomy. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10 (5665): 1-9.
XXIII. Khansa, I., Hendrick, R.G., Shore, A., Meyerson, J., Yang, M., Boehmler, J. H. Breast Reconstruction with Tissue Expanders: Implementation of A Standardized Best-Practices Protocol to Reduce Infection Rates. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery. 2014; 134: 11–18.
XXIV. Cohen, J.B., Carroll, C., Tenenbaum, M.M., Myckatyn, T.M. Breast Implant-Associated Infections: The Role of The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and The Local Microbiome. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery. 2015; 136: 921–9.
XXV. Poppler, L.H., Mundschenk, M.B., Linkugel, A., Zubovic, E., Dolen, U.C., Myckatyn, T.M. Tissue Expander Complications Do Not Preclude A Second Successful Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery. 2019; 143: 24–34.
XXVI. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) [Internet]. [cited 2022Nov27]. Available from:
https://www.plasticsurgery.org/patient-safety/breast-implant-safety/bia-alcl-summary.
XXVII. Clemens, M.W., Brody, G.S., Mahabir, R.C, Miranda, R. N. How to Diagnose and Treat Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery. 2018; 141: 586–99.
XXVIII. Masoomi, H., Clark, E.G., Paydar, K.Z., Evans, G.R.D., Nguyen, A., Kobayashi, M.R., et al. Predictive Risk Factors of Free Flap Thrombosis in Breast Reconstruction Surgery. Microsurgery. 2014; 34 (8): 589-94.
XXIX. Ochoa, O., Chrysopoulo, M., Nastala, C., Ledoux, P., Pisano, S. Abdominal Wall Stability and Flap Complications after Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: Does Body Mass Index Make a Difference? Analysis af 418 Patients and 639 Flaps. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery. 2012; 130:21–33.
XXX. Feng, J., Pardoe, C.I., Mota, A.M., Chui C.H.K., Tan, B.K. Two-Stage Latissimus Dorsi Flap with Implant for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: Getting the Size Right. Archives of Plastic Surgery. 2016; 43 (2): 197–203.
XXXI. Saldanha, I.J., Cao, W., Broyles, J.M., Adam, G.P., Bhuma, M.R., Mehta, S., et al. Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2021.
XXXII. Garza, R., Ochoa, O., Chrysopoulo, M. Post-mastectomy Breast Reconstruction with Autologous Tissue: Current Methods and Techniques. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery-Global Open. 2021; 9 (2): e3433.
XXXIII. Fillip, C.I., Jecan, C.R., Raducu, L., Neau, T.P., Florescu, I.P. Immediate Versus Delayed Breast Reconstruction for Postmastectomy Patients. Controversies and Solutions. Chirurgia. 2017; 112 (4): 378-86.
XXXIV. Cordeiro, P.G., Jazayeri, L. Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: An Evolution of The Conceptual and Technical Approach Over a Two-Decade Period. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2016; 138 (1): 1–11.
XXXV. Quinn, T.T., Miller, G.S., Rostek, M., Cabalag, M.S., Rozen, W.M., Hunter-Smith, D.J. Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction: Indications and Update. Gland Surgery. 2016; 5 (2) :174-86.
XXXVI. Nava, M.B., Catanuto, G., Pennati, A., Cividin, V.V., Spano, A. Expander-Implants Breast Reconstruction. Plastic Surgery, 3rd ed. New York: Elsevier Ltd.; 2013, pp. 336–69.
XXXVII. El-Sabawi, B., Sosin, M., Carey, J.N., Nahabedian, M.Y., Patel, K.M. Breast Reconstruction and Adjuvant Therapy: A Systematic Review of Surgical Outcomes. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2015; 112: 458–64.
XXXVIII. Jeevan, R., Cromwell, D.A., Browne, J.P., Caddy, C.M., Pereira, J., Sheppard, C., et al. Findings of a National Comparative Audit of Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Surgery in England. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. 2014; 67 (10): 1333–44.
XXXIX. Billig, J., Jagsi, R., Qi, J., Hamill, J. B., Kim, H. M., Pusic, A. L., et al. Should Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction be considered in Women who require Post-Mastectomy Radiation Therapy? A Prospective Analysis of Outcomes. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery. 139 (6): 1279-88.
XL. Raposio, E., Belgrano, V., Santi P. L., Chiorri C. Which is The Ideal Breast Size? Some Social Clues for Plastic Surgeons. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2016; 76 (3): 340–5.
XLI. Hamdi, M. Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Surgery of The Breast. The Breast. 2013; 22: 100-5.
XLII. Dec, W. Optimizing Aesthetic Outcomes in Delayed Breast Reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery-Global Open. 2017; 5 (8): e1447.
XLIII. Staziaki, P. V., Urban, C., Furlando, V. F. Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery. 1st ed. Milan: Springer-Verlag Italia; 2013, pp. 305-12.
XLIV. Hershenhouse, K.S., Bick,K., Shauly, O., Kondra, K., Ye, J., Gould, D.J., et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Immediate Versus Delayed Autologous Breast Reconstruction in The Setting of Post-Mastectomy Adjuvant Radiation Therapy. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery. 2021; 74 (5): 931-44.
XLV. Pacaric, S., Orkic, Z., Babic, M., Farcic, N., Milostic-Srb, A., Lovric, R., et al. Impact of Immediate and Delayed Breast Reconstruction on Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Patients. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19 (8546): 1-12.
XLVI. Morzycki, A., Corkum, J., Joukhadar, N., Samargandi, O.,Williams, J., Frank, S. G. The Impact of Delaying BreastReconstruction on Patient Expectationsand Health-Related Quality of Life:An Analysis Using the BREAST-Q. Plastic Surgery. 2019; 28 (4): 1-11.
XLVII. Yoon, A.P., Qi, J., Brown, D.L., Kim, H.M., Hamill, J.B.,Erdmann-Sager, J., et al. Outcomes of Immediate versus Delayed Breast Reconstruction: Results of a Multicenter Prospective Study. Breast. 2018; 37L 72-9.
XLVIII. Seth, A.K., Silver, H.R., Hirsch, E.M., Kim, J.Y., Fine, N.A. Comparison of Delayed and Immediate Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction in The Setting of Post-Mastectomy Radiation Therapy. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2015; 75 (5): 503–7.
XLIX. Sanati-Mehrizy, P., Massenburg, B.B., Rozehnal, J.M., Gupta, N., Rosa, J.H., Ingargiola, M.J., et al. A Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes in Immediate Versus Delayed Reconstruction After Mastectomy. Eplasty. 2015;30(15): e44.
L. Yun, J.H., Diaz, R., Orman, A.G. Breast Reconstruction and Radiation Therapy. Cancer Control. 2018; 25 (1): 1-15.