The Characteristics of Patients with Incompatible Crossmatch Test Results in Indonesian Red Cross of Sidoarjo

Main Article Content

Ni Luh Putu Eka Sudiwati
Ella Febrilia Kusuma
Budi Susatia
Ardi Panggayuh
Nia Lukita Ariani

Abstract

This study discussed the characteristics of patients with the incompatible crossmatch results in 2017- 2021 at Indonesian Red Cross of Sidoarjo. This study was conducted due to the differences, and no study has been conducted regarding the characteristics of adult blood transfusion patients with incompatibility at Indonesian Red Cross of Sidoarjo. The type of study was quantitative descriptive. The sampling technique was the total sampling technique. The data collection technique was documentation through reports from Indonesian Red Cross of Sidoarjo. The results of the study showed that the results of the incompatible crossmatch test were 76 patients with various kinds of incompatible, mainly in the major incompatible of 58 patients (76.40%). The gender most experienced incompatible was female, with 54 patients (71%). Patients who carried out the crossmatch test were mainly 36-45 years old, with 47 patients (62%). The incompatible blood request required blood component PRC 76 (100%). The cause of the most incompatibility case was anemia, with 49 patients (64.46%).

Article Details

How to Cite
Sudiwati, N. L. P. E., Kusuma, E. F., Susatia, B., Panggayuh, A. ., & Ariani, N. L. . (2023). The Characteristics of Patients with Incompatible Crossmatch Test Results in Indonesian Red Cross of Sidoarjo. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies, 3(06), 1220–1225. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v3-i6-35
Section
Articles

References

I. Andriyani, R., Triana A. & Juliarti, W., (2015). Buku Ajar Biologi Reproduksi dan Perkembangan. Edisi 1. Yogyakarta : Deepublish

II. Anita dan Rachmawati AM, mansyur arif. (2015).Gambaran Direct Antiglobulin Test Pada Inkompatibilitas Description Of Direct Antiglobulin Test In, 2(4), 8–13.

III. Arikunto, S (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta : PT Rinka Cipta

IV. Bhattacharya, P., Samanta, E., Afroza, N., Naik, A., & Biswas, R. (2018). An approach to Incompatible Cross matched Red Cells: Asian Journal of Transfusion Science, 12(1), 51–56.

V. Gulo, W (2022). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta : Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia

VI. Hutomo, F. p. (2011). Dasar – Dasar Transfusi Darah, WIMI, Jakarta

VII. Iriani, Rineita Diah H, dan Muhammad Kusumawan. (2019). Peramalan Persediaan Darah pada Unit Transfusi Darah PMI Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Departemen Teknik Mesin dan Industri FT UGM.

VIII. Lima, P. R., & Destefani, A, C. (2016). Irregular Antibodies of Crossmatch Types Incompatibility Testing on Diagnosis and Blood Types Using Gel Method. Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory, 23(1), 36 – 41

IX. Maharani, E, A. dan Noviar, G. (2015). Imunohematologi dan Bank Darah (pp. 1–27). PPSDM Kemenkes RI.

X. Makroo, R.N. (2009). Compatibility Testing (Pre Transfusion Testing). Practice of Safe Blood Transfusion Compendium of Transfusion Medicine. New Delhi : Kongposh, p. 123 – 131

XI. Masturoh, I., & Temesvari, N. A. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kesehatan. PPSDM Kemenkes RI.

XII. Mulyantari Kadek, Y. S. (2016). Laboratorium pratransfusi (J. Atmaja (ed.); pp. 82–106). Udayana University Press.

XIII. Nadia, B, & Handayani, D. & Rismiati, R., (2010). Hidup Sehat Berdasarkan Golongan Darah. Jakarta : Dukom Publisher

XIV. Nakagawa, K., et al. (2020). Tacrolimus Treatment Saved A Rho-Incompatible Pregnancy. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 33(22), pp. 3873-6

XV. National Institute of Health (2022). Medline Plus. ABO Incompatibility.

XVI. Nency, Y. M., dan Sumanti, D. (2016). Latar Belakang Penyakit pada Penggunaan Transfusi Komponen Darah pada Anak. Sari Pediatri, 13(3), 159. Departemen Ilmu Kesehatan Anak, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro/RSUP Dr Kariadi Semarang.

XVII. Notoadmodjo, S (2012). Metode Penelitian Kesehatan. Jakarta : PT Rineka Cipta.

XVIII. PeraturanMenteriKesehatanRepublik Indonesia Nomor 91 2015 Tentang Standar Pelayan TransfusiDarah (2015)RetrievedOktober 1,2022,from

http://www.depkes.go.id/resources/download/general/ PMKNo.91TtgStandarPelayananTransfusi

Darah.pdf.

XIX. Redaksi AUtoimuncare. (2022). Penyakit yang Membutuhkan Transfusi Darah, Manfaat dan Resikonya. https://autoimuncare.co.id/ginjal/penyakit- yang-membutuhkan-transfusi-darah/. Diakses pada 9 Oktober 2022

XX. Ritchie, N. K. (2014). Inkompatibilitas Dalam PemeriksaanCrossmatch.Jakarta.

http://id.scribd.com/doc/249330193/SEROLOGI- GGOLONGAN-DARAH-Compatibility-Mode-2-pdf

XXI. Setyati, Julia, & Ag. Soemantri. (2010). Transfusi Darah yang Rasional. Pelita Insani

XXII. Sugiyono (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung : PT Alfabet

XXIII. Sulung, N. (2018). Perbedaan Reaksi Pemberian Transfusi Darah Whoole Blood (WB) Dan Human Care Journal, 1(3).

XXIV. Swarup D, Dhot PS, Kotwal J, Verma AK. (2008). Comparive Study of Blood Crossmatching Using Convensinal and Geel Method. Med J Armed Forces India

XXV. Tyndall C, Cuzzilla R, Kane S. (2020). The rhesus incompatible pregnancy and its consequences for affected fetuses and neonates. Transfusion and Apheresis Science, 59(5), pp. 102948

XXVI. Yelima, J. et al. (2019). Complications of Blood Transfusion and Management : Definitions and History of Blood Group Systems. European Journal of Biology and Mediccal Science Research, 7(3), pp. 25 – 34

XXVII. Yuan S, 2011, Pretransfusion Compatibility Testing (http://pathology.ucla.edu/workfiles/Education/Transfusi on%20Medicine/Pretransfusion-Compatibility- Testing.pdf). Diakses tanggal 9 Oktober 2022

XXVIII. Zundel, W. B. (2012). Pretransfusion Testing. Blood Groups and Serologic Testing. In : Harmening, D. M. Modern Blood Banking & Transfusion Practices 6th Edition. Philadelphia : F.A Davis company. P. 241 – 259