Effectiveness of Walk Standing Backbend Arch or Modified Anuvittasana in Patients with Si Joint Dysfunction: Experimental Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background – Sacroiliac joint dysfunction is a painful musculoskeletal condition, responsible for 15-30% cases of low back pain, also called as Sacroiliac syndrome. It is a term often used to describe pain in and around the region of the joint that is due to traumatic, infection, inflammatory, degenerative, metabolic and biomechanical disorders of the joint (hypermobility and hypo mobility) and pathological conditions.
Methodology – The Study design is Experimental. Total 25 samples are selected conveniently for this study. Data was collected by using Pain perception on VAS (Visual Analog Scale) and Disability Score on Revised Oswestry Disability Index
Results – It has been proved significant that there is average improvement of 16.48 in ODI and 5.04 in VAS. The result of experimenting the effectiveness of walk standing position back bend arch or modified Anuvittasana among 25 individuals with SI joint dysfunction is proved significantly effective on the patients who has undergone the treatment for 7 sessions of 7 day.
Conclusion - It can be concluded from the present study that there is significant improvement in the pain, range of motion, activities of daily living that underwent walk standing position back bend arch or modified Anuvittasana exercise
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Cho BY, Yoon JG. The effect of gait training with shoe inserts on the improvement of pain and gait in sacroiliac joint patients. Journal of physical therapy science. 2015;27(8):2469-71.
II. Raj MA, Ampat G, Varacallo M. Sacroiliac Joint Pain. StatPearls [Internet]. 2020 Sep 3.
III. Liliang PC, Lu K, Liang CL, Tsai YD, Wang KW, Chen HJ. Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar and lumbosacral fusion: findings using dual sacroiliac joint blocks. Pain Medicine. 2011 Apr 1;12(4):565-70.
IV. Forst SL, Wheeler MT, Fortin JD, Vilensky JA. The sacroiliac joint: anatomy, physiology and clinical significance. Pain physician. 2006 Jan 1;9(1):61-7.
V. Monticone M, Barbarino A, Testi C, Arzano S, Moschi A, Negrini S. Symptomatic efficacy of stabilizing treatment versus laser therapy for sub-acute low back pain with positive tests for sacroiliac dysfunction: a randomised clinical controlled trial with 1 year follow-up. Europa Medicophysica. 2004 Dec 1;40(4):263-8.
VI. Mooney V, Verna J, Morris C. Clinical management of chronic, disabling low back syndromes. Rehabilitation of the spine: a practitioner’s manual. New York: McGraw-Hill. 2006.
VII. Foley BS, Buschbacher RM. Sacroiliac joint pain: anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis, and treatment. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation. 2006 Dec 1;85(12):997-1006.
VIII. Prather H, Hunt D. Conservative management of low back pain, part I. Sacroiliac joint pain. Disease-a-month. 2004 Dec 1;50(12):670-83.
IX. Kamali F, Shokri E. The effect of two manipulative therapy techniques and their outcome in patients with sacroiliac joint syndrome. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies. 2012 Jan 1;16(1):29-35