Translation, and Validation of Perceived Obstacles to Pain Assessment and Management Practices Questionnaire among Vietnamese Nurses

Main Article Content

Nga Nguyen Thi
Anh Truong Tuan
Hoang Duong Huy
Hang Nguyen Thi

Abstract

Introduction: Barriers ralated to patients, physian, nurses, and health system were the mostly responded by nurses as factors influencing them in pain management for patients. So, the valiable and riliable questionnaire is verry importence to measure the perception of Vietnamese nurses about pain management barriers


The study objective: was to translate, adapt and conduct initial psychometric validation of the Vietnamese version of Perceived Obstacles to Pain Assessment and Management Practices questionnaire (V-POPAMP).


Material and method: Translation, adaptation, and validity and reliability testing were performed . 6 expert panels evaluated content validity, and I-CVI, SCVI were applied to measured the content validity. The Cronbach alpha and ICC were used to measured for intenal consistence and stable reliability of  V- POPAMP,  respectively. A sample of 30 nurses was sellected in prepilot testing, and 30 other nurses participted in pilot testing.


Results: The study found that I-CVI of each item ranged from 0.83-1 and S-CVI =0.96, indicating the V- POPAMP is good content validity. In addition, the V- POPAMP is good reliability, with Cronbach alpha for each subscale of 0.729 and more, and ICC for total score was 0.952 and for each subscale ranges  from 0.822 to 0.984(p=.000)


Conclusion:The V-POPAMPQ has good psychometric properties.  It can be used to measure the perception of nurses about pain management barriers in Vietnam.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nga Nguyen Thi, Anh Truong Tuan, Hoang Duong Huy, & Hang Nguyen Thi. (2023). Translation, and Validation of Perceived Obstacles to Pain Assessment and Management Practices Questionnaire among Vietnamese Nurses. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies, 3(3), 440–451. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v3-i3-27
Section
Articles

References

I. Tawil S, Iskandar K, Salameh P (2018). Pain management in hospitals: patients’ satisfaction and related barriers. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2018; 16(3):1268.

Doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2018.03.1268

II. Benimana O. Knowledge, attitudes, practices and challenges faced by nurses in pain management among surgical patients in One Referral Hospital in Rwanda. University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda. 2017. View at: Google Scholar.

III. Geeraerts T, Velly L, Abdennour L et al (2018). Management of severe traumatic brain injury (first 24hours). Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine. 2018; 37(2): 171-186.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2017.12.001

IV. Gan TJ . Poorly controlled postoperative pain: prevalence, consequences, and prevention. J Pain Res. 2017; 10: 2287–2298.

Doi: 10.2147/JPR.S144066

V. Bartoszczyk DA, Gilbertson-White S. Interventions for nurse-related barriers in cancer pain management. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2015; 42: 634–641. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar

VI. Wuni A, Salia SM, Ibrahim MM, et al. Evaluating knowledge, practices, and barriers of paediatric pain management among nurses in a tertiary health facility in the Northern Region of Ghana: A descriptive cross-Sectional study. Pain Research and Management. 2020; 2020: 1-11. Doi: 10.1155/2020/8846599. eCollection 2020

VII. Menlah A, Garti I, Amoo SA, et al. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Postoperative Pain Management by Nurses in Selected District Hospitals in Ghana. SAGE Open Nursing. 2018; 4(4): 1-11. Doi:10.1177/2377960818790383

VIII. Rababa M, Al Sabbah S, Hayajneh AA. Nurses’ Perceived Barriers to and Facilitators of Pain Assessment and Management in Critical Care Patients: A Systematic Review. Journal of Pain Research. 2021; 5(14), 3475-3491. Doi: 10.2147/JPR.S332423. eCollection 2021

IX. Ortiz, MM, Carr E, Dikareva A. An integrative review of the literature on pain management barriers: implications for the Canadian clinical context. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research. 2014; 46(3): 65–93.

Doi: 10.1177/084456211404600305.

X. Dalton JA, Blau W, Carlson J, et al. Changing the Relationship among Nurses’ Knowledge, Self-Reported Behavior, and Documented Behavior in Pain Management: Does Education Make a Difference? Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 196; 12(5):308–319.

Doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(96)00183-2.

XI. Titler MG, Herr K, Schilling ML, et al.(2003). Acute pain treatment for older adult hospitalized with hip fracture: current nursing practices and perceived barrier. Apply Nursing Research. 2003; 16(4): 221-227.

Doi: 10.1016/s0897-1897(03)00051-x.

XII. Coker E, Papaioannou A, Kaasalainen S, & et al. Nurses' perceived barriers to optimal pain management in older adults on acute medical units. Applied Nursing Research. 2010; 23(3):139–146. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2008.07.003.

XIII. Dabrowka WM, Dabrowski S, Wojnicka AG, et al. Barriers perceived by nurses in the optimal treatment of postoperative pain. Open Med. 2017; 12: 239-246. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2017-0037.

XIV. Elcigil A, Maltepe H, Eşrefgil G, etal. Nurses’ Perceived Barriers to Assessment and Management of Pain in a University Hospital. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology. 2011; 33(1): S33–S38.

Doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e3182121bef

XV. Alyssa E. (2019). "Nurses' Perceptions of the Barriers to Using Nonpharmacological Methods to Relieve Patients' Pain in the Acute Care Setting". Master's Theses, Dissertations, Graduate Research and Major Papers Overview. 2019. https://digitalcommons.ric.edu/etd/299

XVI. Tsang S, Royse CF, Terkawi AS. Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017; 11(1):S80-S89. Doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17.

XVII. World Health Organization: Process of translation and adaptation of instruments.

[http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/]. Accessed 5 Jan 2017.

XVIII. Ikart E. (2019). Survey questionnaire survey pretesting method: An evaluation of survey questionnaire via expert reviews technique. Asian Journal of Social Science Studies. 2019; 4(2): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.20849/ajsss.v4i2.565

XIX. Downs F. Reading in research methodology. 2 ed. Lippincott. 1999

XX. Walt CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER. Measurement in nursing and health research. 3 ed. Springer. 2005

XXI. Irwin DL, Lass NJ, Pannbacker M, et al. Clinical research methods in speech-language pathology and audiology. 3rd ed. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing. 2019

XXII. Streiner DL. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J Pers Assess. 2003; 80(1):99–103. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18)

XXIII. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. Multivariate data analysis 7th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education. 2010

XXIV. Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine. 2016; 15: 155-163.

Doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

Most read articles by the same author(s)