Prevalence, Characteristics and Risk Factors relating to Urinary Incontinence in Gynecology Polyclinic using Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID) Indonesian Version
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The virtue of QUID is that there are only six short questions, they are all consistent in length, and their values adjust when symptoms become better. Urinary incontinence examinations can be carried out in a variety of ways to make a more thorough diagnosis, including history taking, directed physical examinations, urinalysis and residual volume, post-urine. voiding, and special examinations. Using a urinary incontinence diagnosis questionnaire, it is ideal to be able to identify the type and level of urinary incontinence that occurs. Numerous languages, including Indonesian, have had their translations of QUID put to the test.
Methods: Utilizing a QUID device that has undergone validity and reliability testing, the study was carried out using a cross-sectional observational survey method to determine the prevalence rate of urinary incontinence. It then moved on to an internal comparative analysis to determine the relationship between risk factors and the incidence of urinary incontinence.
Results: Urinary incontinence was a complaint made by 40 persons (10%). Only age remained as a variable that only influences the probability of urine incontinence after performing a multivariate analysis using the logistic regression method. Age 51 to 60 is anticipated to have a 4.280 times higher risk of urinary incontinence than age 18 to 50, which is statistically significant (p=0.002). In the meantime, those over 60 were statistically significant (p=0.000) and at risk up to 21.4 times more than those between age18 and 50.
Conclusions: Both medical and paramedical staff can use the QUID questionnaire and recommend it for wider usage, particularly in primary care or level I health institutions for screening, as this treatment can still be started in early.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Swift SE, Epidemilogy of pelvic organ prolapse and Urinary Incontinence. In : Bent AE, Cundiff GW, Swift SE, editors. Osteogard’s Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction 6th edition. Philadelphia. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2008 ; p.27-38
II. Milsom I, Altman D, et all. Epidemiology of Urinary Incontinence (UI) and other Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS), Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) and Anal Incontinence (AI). In : Abrams P, Cardozo L, et all editors. Incontinence. 5th edition. Paris. ICS-ICUD-EAU. 2013; p. 17-42
III. Rijal C, Hakim S. Prevalensi Inkontinensia Urine dan Faktor - Faktor Resiko yang Berhubungan Pada Wanita yang Tinggal di Panti Werdha. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia; 2013. P.11-18
IV. Sumardi R, Santoso BI, Junizaf, et al. Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence, Risk Factors and Its Impact: Multivariate Analysis from Indonesian Nationwide Survey . Indonesian Prevalence on Incontinence Study Group-Continence Society of Indonesia. Acta Medica Indonesiana. Jakarta, 2008. P.175-182
V. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM et al An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 21. 2010(1):5–26
VI. McKenzie S, Watson T, Thompson J, et all. Stress urinary incontinence is highly prevalent in recreationally active women attending gyms or exercise classes . The International Urogynecological Association 2016 . Int Urogynecol J (2016) 27:1175–1184
VII. Abrams P, Andersson K.E, Birder L, et all. Evaluation and Treatment of Urinary Incontinence, Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Faecal Incontinence . In : 4th International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee . Paris. 2009; p.1767-1820
VIII. Bradley CS, Rovner ES, Morgan MA, Berlin M, Novi JM, JA JAS, et al. A New Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID) in Women: Development and Testing. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005;192(1):66-73.
IX. Bradley CS, Rahn DD, Nygaard IE, Barber MD, Nager CW, Kenton KS, et al. The Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID): Validity and Responsiveness to Change in Women Undergoing Non-Surgical Therapies for Treatment of Stress Predominant Urinary Incontinence. Neurourology and urodynamics. 2010;29(5):727-34.
X. Yngvild S. Hannestad, Guri Rortveit, Anne Kjersti Daltveit, Steinar Hunskaar. Are smoking and other lifestyle factors associated with female urinary incontinence? The Norwegian EPINCONT Study. BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. March 2003, Vol. 110, pp. 247–254
XI. Reddy P. Principles and Practice of Urogynaecology: Evaluation of Urinary Incontinence. Springer. 2015. p.35
XII. Saadia Z. Effect of Age, Educational Status, Parity and BMI on Development of Urinary Incontinence - a Cross Sectional Study in Saudi Population. Mater Sociomed. 2015 Aug; 27(4): 251-254
XIII. Jayanti, KS dan Kurniawati, EM. Faktor Risiko Inkontinensia Urin Tipe Stres pada Persalinan Spontan Pervaginam. Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Airlangga. Surabaya. 2013
XIV. Wiratmoko A. Pola Inkontinensia Urin pada Wanita Usia diatas Lima Puluh Tahun. FK UNDIP. Semarang. 2003
XV. Peyrat, et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Urinary Incontinence in Young and Middle-Aged Women. BJU International (2002), 89, 61-66
XVI. Fakhrizal,dkk. Prevalence And Risk Factors of Persistent Stress Urinary Incontinence at Three Months Postpartum in Indonesian Women. Med J Indones. 2016;25:163–70
XVII. Luber KM. The Definition, Prevalence, and Risk Factors for Stress Urinary Incontinence. Reviews in Urology Vol. 6 suppl. 3 2004. S3-S9
XVIII. Wiknjosastro H. Ilmu Kandungan. PT Bina Pustaka Sarwono Prawirohardjo. Jakarta. 2009. hal 465
Goepel, et al. Review Article: Urinary Incontinence in the Eldery. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International 2010; 107(30): 531–6
XIX. Mishra, et al. Body weight through adult life and risk of urinary incontinence in middle-aged women: results from a British prospective cohort. International Journal of Obesity (2008) 32, 1415–1422.
XX. Tampakoudis, et al. Cigarette smoking and urinary incontinence in women a new calculative method of estimating the exposure to smoke. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 63 (1995) 27 30.
XXI. Mahishale, Arati and Dave, Himani. Contributing Factors for Urinary Incontinence in Postnatal Women–a Survey. IOSR Journal of Sports and Physical Education (IOSR-JSPE), Volume 3, Issue 6, (Nov. – Dec. 2016), PP 01-05.
XXII. Arshiya, et al. Etiology, Risk Factors and Pathophysiology of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Review. International Research Journal of Biological Sciences Vol. 4(6), 75-82, June (2015).
XXIII. Foldspang, et al. Parity as a correlate of adult female urinary incontinence prevalence. J7ournal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1992; 46: 595-600.
XXIV. Intermountain Healthcare. Stress Urinary Incontinence. Fact Sheet For Patients And Families (2010).
XXV. Preeti Jain, Preeti and Parsons, Matthew. ReviewThe effects ofobesity on the pelvic floor. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist2011;13:133–142.
XXVI. Nojomi, et al. Urinary incontinence: hospital-based prevalence and risk factors. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences January & February 2008; Vol 13, No 1.
XXVII. Loh KY and Sivalingam N. Urinary Incontinence in the Elderly Population. Med J Malaysia Vol 61 No 4 October 2006.
XXVIII. Kim Y, Kwak Y. Urinary Incontinence in women in relation to occupational status. WOMEN & HEALTH http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2016.1150387 . Red Cross College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea . 2016