Clinical Perspectives on Tandem Spinal Stenosis: Addressing the Controversies in Surgical Management

Main Article Content

Carlos Carreón-Cerda
Mario Lezama- Peniche
Víctor Alayón- Vázquez
Adrián Chan-Cisneros

Abstract

Introduction: Tandem spinal stenosis, characterized by narrowing at multiple spinal levels, often affects the cervical and lumbar regions and is linked to neurological deficits. Commonly stemming from degenerative or congenital changes, its prevalence increases with aging, especially for cervical myelopathy associated with lumbar stenosis. Diagnosis relies on imaging, with MRI offering precise evaluation of spinal compression and neural impact.


Review: This review examines tandem spinal stenosis management, noting ongoing debate on treatment approaches. While simultaneous decompression minimizes hospital time, staged surgery may reduce complications and tailor treatment to predominant symptoms. For patients with primary lumbar symptoms, cervical decompression has shown to alleviate lumbar issues due to motor pathway organization.


Conclusions: Tandem spinal stenosis requires early diagnosis and individualized treatment, especially as prevalence rises with an aging population. A tailored approach enhances therapeutic outcomes and supports better quality of life for affected patients.

Article Details

How to Cite
Carlos Carreón-Cerda, Mario Lezama- Peniche, Víctor Alayón- Vázquez, & Adrián Chan-Cisneros. (2024). Clinical Perspectives on Tandem Spinal Stenosis: Addressing the Controversies in Surgical Management. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies, 4(11), 2022–2028. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v4-i11-13
Section
Articles

References

I. Dagi TF, Tarkington MA, Leech JJ. Tandem lumbar and cervical spinal stenosis. Natural history, prognostic indices, and results after surgical decompression: Natural history, prognostic indices, and results after surgical decompression. J Neurosurg. 1987;66(6):842–849. doi:10.3171/jns.1987.66.6.0842

II. Schaffer JC, Raudenbush BL, Molinari C, Molinari RW. Symptomatic triple-region spinal stenosis treated with simultaneous surgery: Case report and review of the literature. Global Spine J. 2015;5(6):513–521. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1566226

III. Bai Q, Wang Y, Zhai J, Wu J, Zhang Y, Zhao Y. Current understanding of tandem spinal stenosis: epidemiology, diagnosis, and surgical strategy. EFORT Open Rev. 2022;7(8):587–598. doi:10.1530/EOR-22-0016

IV. Sun WZ, Yan X, Yang YL, et al. Simultaneous or staged decompressions for patients with tandem spinal stenosis. Orthop Surg. 2021;13(4):1149–1158. doi:10.1111/os.12906

V. Baker JF. Evaluation and treatment of tandem spinal stenosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28(6):229–239. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00726

VI. Kobayashi T, Yawara E, Suzuki M. Evaluation of spinal alignment and clinical findings for the efficacy of one-stage surgery in tandem spinal stenosis. Cureus.

VII. Wang C, Wang QZ, Gao JH, Zhang L, Zhang L, Chen BH. Clinical comparison of selective versus nonselective decompression for symptomatic tandem stenosis of the cervical and thoracic spine: A retrospective cohort study. Orthop Surg. 2021;13(2):537–545. doi:10.1111/os.12889

VIII. Overley SC, Kim JS, Gogel BA, Merrill RK, Hecht AC. Tandem spinal stenosis: A systematic review. JBJS Rev. 2017;5(9):e2. doi:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00007

IX. Lin Y, Xu G, Sun Y, Zhou J, Feng F. Tandem stenosis of the cervical and thoracic spine: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024;25(1):640. doi:10.1186/s12891-024-07718-1

X. Patel E, Perloff M. Radicular pain syndromes: Cervical, lumbar, and spinal stenosis. Semin Neurol. 2018;38(06):634–639. doi:10.1055/s-0038-1673680

XI. Lee SH, Kim KT, Suk KS, et al. Asymptomatic cervical cord compression in lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a whole spine magnetic resonance imaging study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(23):2057–2063. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f4588a

XII. Bajwa NS, Toy JO, Young EY, Ahn NU. Is congenital bony stenosis of the cervical spine associated with lumbar spine stenosis? An anatomical study of 1072 human cadaveric specimens: Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;17(1):24–29. doi:10.3171/2012.3.spine111080

XIII. Adamova B, Bednarik J, Andrasinova T, et al. Does lumbar spinal stenosis increase the risk of spondylotic cervical spinal cord compression? Eur Spine J. 2015;24(12):2946–2953. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4049-0

XIV. Nagata K, Yoshimura N, Hashizume H, et al. The prevalence of tandem spinal stenosis and its characteristics in a population-based MRI study: The Wakayama Spine Study. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(10):2529–2535. doi:10.1007/s00586-017-5072-0

XV. Farahbakhsh F, Khosravi S, Baigi V, et al. The prevalence of asymptomatic cervical spinal cord compression in individuals presenting with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: A meta-analysis. Global Spine J. 2024;14(3):1052–1060. doi:10.1177/21925682231202776

XVI. Matsumoto M, Okada E, Toyama Y, Fujiwara H, Momoshima S, Takahata T. Tandem age-related lumbar and cervical intervertebral disc changes in asymptomatic subjects. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(4):708–713. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2500-z

XVII. Hong CC, Liu KPG. A rare case of multiregional spinal stenosis: clinical description, surgical complication, and management concept review. Global Spine J. 2015;5(1):49–54. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1378139

XVIII. Chen G, Fan T, Yang X, Sun C, Fan D, Chen Z. The prevalence and clinical characteristics of thoracic spinal stenosis: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(9):2164–2172. doi:10.1007/s00586-020-06520-6

XIX. Jannelli G, Baticam NS, Tizi K, Truffert A, Lascano AM, Tessitore E. Symptomatic tandem spinal stenosis: a clinical, diagnostic, and surgical challenge. Neurosurg Rev. 2020;43(5):1289–1295. doi:10.1007/s10143-019-01154-9

XX. Nurick S. The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1972;95(1):87–100. doi:10.1093/brain/95.1.87

XXI. Soufi KH, Perez TM, Umoye AO, Yang J, Burgos M, Martin AR. How is spinal cord function measured in degenerative cervical myelopathy? A systematic review. J Clin Med. 2022;11(5):1441. doi:10.3390/jcm11051441

XXII. Smorgick Y, Granek T, Mirovsky Y, Rabau O, Anekstein Y, Tal S. Routine sagittal whole-spine magnetic resonance imaging in finding incidental spine lesions. MAGMA. 2021;34(3):421–426. doi:10.1007/s10334-020-00882-0

XXIII. van Eck CF, Spina NT Iii, Lee JY. A novel MRI classification system for congenital functional lumbar spinal stenosis predicts the risk for tandem cervical spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(2):368–373. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4657-3

XXIV. Gangavalli AK, Malige A, Sokunbi G. Multilevel critical stenosis with minimal functional deficits: a case of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2018;4(1):104.

doi:10.1038/s41394-018-0138-8

XXV. Guadarrama-Ortiz P, Ruíz-Rivero CO, Capi-Casillas D, Román-Villagómez A, Prieto-Rivera ÁD, Choreño-Parra JA. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with cervical spine degeneration reveal frequent cervicolumbar tandem spinal stenosis in Mexico. Int J Spine Surg. 2023;17(5):670–677. doi:10.14444/8520

XXVI. Miyazaki M, Kodera R, Yoshiiwa T, Kawano M, Kaku N, Tsumura H. Prevalence and distribution of thoracic and lumbar compressive lesions in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Asian Spine J. 2015;9(2):218–224. doi:10.4184/asj.2015.9.2.218

XXVII. Badhiwala JH, Ahuja CS, Akbar MA, et al. Degenerative cervical myelopathy - update and future directions. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16(2):108–124. doi:10.1038/s41582-019-0303-0

XXVIII. Revanappa KK, Moorthy RK, Jeyaseelan V, Rajshekhar V. Modification of Nurick scale and Japanese Orthopedic Association score for Indian population with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurol India. 2015;63(1):24–29. doi:10.4103/0028-3886.152627

XXIX. McCormick JR, Sama AJ, Schiller NC, Butler AJ, Donnally CJ 3rd. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A guide to diagnosis and management. J Am Board Fam Med. 2020;33(2):303–313. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2020.02.190195

XXX. Youssef JA, Heiner AD, Montgomery JR, et al. Outcomes of posterior cervical fusion and decompression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J. 2019;19(10):1714–1729. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2019.04.019

XXXI. Singrakhia MD, Malewar NR, Deshmukh S, Deshmukh SS. Prospective analysis of functional outcome of single-stage surgical treatment for symptomatic tandem spinal stenosis. Indian J Orthop. 2019;53(2):315–323. doi:10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_316_17

XXXII. Suri A, Chabbra RPS, Mehta VS, Gaikwad S, Pandey RM. Effect of intramedullary signal changes on the surgical outcome of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J. 2003;3(1):33–45. doi:10.1016/s1529-9430(02)00448-5

XXXIII. Bhandutia A, Brown L, Nash A, et al. Delayed diagnosis of tandem spinal stenosis: A retrospective institutional review. Int J Spine Surg. 2019;13(3):283–288. doi:10.14444/6038

XXXIV. Ghobrial GM, Oppenlander ME, Maulucci CM, et al. Management of asymptomatic cervical spinal stenosis in the setting of symptomatic tandem lumbar stenosis: a review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;124:114–118. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.06.012

XXXV. Khan O, Badhiwala JH, Akbar MA, Fehlings MG. Prediction of worse functional status after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: A machine learning approach. Neurosurgery. 2021;88(3):584–591. doi:10.1093/neuros/nyaa477

XXXVI. Cao J, Gao X, Yang Y, et al. Simultaneous or staged operation for tandem spinal stenosis: surgical strategy and efficacy comparison. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):214. doi:10.1186/s13018-021-02357-x

XXXVII. Abbas Z, Asati S, Kundnani VG, Jain S, Prakash R, Raut S. Surgical outcomes of single stage surgery for Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) in elderly and younger patients: A comparative study. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;17:157–162. doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2021.03.007

XXXVIII. Felbaum DR, Fayed I, Stewart JJ, Sandhu FA. Relief of lumbar symptoms after cervical decompression in patients with tandem spinal stenosis presenting with primarily lumbar pain. Cureus.

XXXIX. Inoue T, Ando K, Kobayashi K, et al. Primary cervical decompression surgery may improve lumbar symptoms in patients with tandem spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J. 2021;30(4):899–906. doi:10.1007/s00586-020-06693-0

XL. Hu PP, Yu M, Liu XG, Liu ZJ, Jiang L. Surgeries for patients with tandem spinal stenosis in cervical and thoracic spine: Combined or staged surgeries? World Neurosurg. 2017;107:115–123.

doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.129

XLI. Akar E, Öğrenci A, Koban O, Yilmaz M, Dalbayrak S. Three region spinal decompression in the same session: a case report. Br J Neurosurg. 2023;37(6):1898–1900. doi:10.1080/02688697.2021.1887449

XLII. Kikuike K, Miyamoto K, Hosoe H, Shimizu K. One-staged combined cervical and lumbar decompression for patients with tandem spinal stenosis on cervical and lumbar spine: analyses of clinical outcomes with minimum 3 years follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22(8):593–601. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181929cbd

XLIII. Reuben JD, Meyers SJ, Cox DD, Elliott M, Watson M, Shim SD. Cost comparison between bilateral simultaneous, staged, and unilateral total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13(2):172–179. doi:10.1016/s0883-5403(98)90095-x

XLIV. Epstein NE, Epstein JA, Carras R, Murthy VS, Hyman RA. Coexisting cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis: diagnosis and management. Neurosurgery. 1984;15(4):489–496. doi:10.1227/00006123-198410000-00003

XLV. Alvin MD, Alentado VJ, Lubelski D, Benzel EC, Mroz TE. Cervical spine surgery for tandem spinal stenosis: The impact on low back pain. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018;166:50–53. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.024

XLVI. Yamada T, Yoshii T, Yamamoto N, Hirai T, Inose H, Okawa A. Surgical outcomes for lumbar spinal canal stenosis with coexisting cervical stenosis (tandem spinal stenosis): a retrospective analysis of 565 cases. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1). doi:10.1186/s13018-018-0765-6

XLVII. Luo CA, Kaliya-Perumal AK, Lu ML, Chen LH, Chen WJ, Niu CC. Staged surgery for tandem cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis: Which should be treated first? Eur Spine J. 2019;28(1):61–68. doi:10.1007/s00586-018-5795-6

XLVIII. Krishnan A, Dave BR, Kambar AK, Ram H. Coexisting lumbar and cervical stenosis (tandem spinal stenosis): an infrequent presentation. Retrospective analysis of single-stage surgery (53 cases). Eur Spine J. 2014;23(1):64–73. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2868-4

XLIX. Pennington Z, Alentado VJ, Lubelski D, et al. Quality of life changes after lumbar decompression in patients with tandem spinal stenosis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019;184(105455):105455. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105455

L. Aydogan M, Ozturk C, Mirzanli C. Treatment approach in tandem (concurrent) cervical and lumbar spinal ste- nosis. Acta Orthop Belg. 2007;3:234–237.

Most read articles by the same author(s)