Prevalence and Angulation of Mandibular Third Molar Impaction in Zliten, Libya: A Retrospective Radiographic Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: This retrospective study investigates the prevalence and angulation of impacted mandibular third molars and the most affected sex in a sample of Libyan patients between the ages of (19 and 84) who live in Zliten, Libya.
Study Design: Sixty-nine patients between the ages of (19 and 84) referred to the Assalam Dental Centre were included in this retrospective study. Of the 69 patients, 30 females and 39 males were assessed for the prevalence and position of an impacted mandibular third molar on panoramic radiographs.
Results:Out of 124 mandibular third molars, seventy-six were found to be impacted on both right and left sides, from which mesioangular impaction was the most common angulation in females. In contrast, vertical impaction was the most common in males. In addition, the prevalence of impacted mandibular third molars were more in females.
Conclusion: The prevalence of impacted mandibular third molars is higher in females than males, and mesioangular impaction is the most common in females, while vertical angulation is frequently common in males.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Hassan, A.H., Pattern of third molar impaction in a Saudi population. Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry, 2010. 2: p. 109.
II. Eshghpour, M., N.M. Rezaei, and A. Nejat, Effect of menstrual cycle on frequency of alveolar osteitis in women undergoing surgical removal of mandibular third molar: a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2013. 71(9): p. 1484-1489.
III. Andreasen, J.O., J. Peterson, and D.M. Laskin, Textbook and color atlas of tooth impactions. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 1997. 112(3): p. 354.
IV. Aysha, S., Angulations of impacted mandibular third molar: A radiographic study in Saveetha dental college. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 2015. 7(11): p. 981.
V. Bishara, S.E. and D. Ortho, Impacted maxillary canines: a review. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 1992. 101(2): p. 159-171.
VI. Akarslan, Z.Z. and C. Kocabay, Assessment of the associated symptoms, pathologies, positions and angulations of bilateral occurring mandibular third molars: Is there any similarity? Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 2009. 108(3): p. e26-e32.
VII. Hattab, F.N., A.R. Ma'amon, and M.S. Fahmy, Impaction status of third molars in Jordanian students. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 1995. 79(1): p. 24-29.
VIII. Al-Anqudi, S.M., et al., Prevalence and pattern of third molar impaction: a retrospective study of radiographs in Oman. Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, 2014. 14(3): p. e388.
IX. Molander, B., et al., Agreement between panoramic and intra-oral radiography in the assessment of marginal bone height. Dentomaxillofacial radiology, 1991. 20(3): p. 155-160.
X. Guidance, N., Guidance on the extraction of wisdom teeth. Published date, 2000. 27.
XI. Alayan, I.A. and M. Shabeesh, Evaluation of Mandibular Third Molars Impaction Related to Inferior Alveolar Nerve by Using Panoramic Radiography in Zliten City, Libya: A retrospective study. International Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Research, 2022: p. 6-10.
XII. Winter, G.B., Principles of Exodontia as Applied to the Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: A Complete Treatise on the Operative Technic with Clinical Diagnoses and Radiographic Interpretations. 1926: American medical book Company.
XIII. Haidar, Z. and S.Y. Shalhoub, The incidence of impacted wisdom teeth in a Saudi community. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1986. 15(5): p. 569-571.
XIV. Brown, L., et al., A radiological study of the frequency and distribution of impacted teeth. The Journal of the Dental Association of South Africa= Die Tydskrif van die Tandheelkundige Vereniging van Suid-Afrika, 1982. 37(9): p. 627-630.
XV. Kramer, R.M. and A.C. Williams, The incidence of impacted teeth: A survey at Harlem Hospital. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 1970. 29(2): p. 237-241.
XVI. Dachi, S.F. and F.V. Howell, A survey of 3,874 routine full-mouth radiographs: II. A study of impacted teeth. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 1961. 14(10): p. 1165-1169.
XVII. Mack, P., Maxillary arch and central incisor dimensions in a Nigerian and British population sample. Journal of Dentistry, 1981. 9(1): p. 67-70.
XVIII. Hattab, F.N., Positional changes and eruption of impacted mandibular third molars in young adults: a radiographic 4-year follow-up study. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 1997. 84(6): p. 604-608.
XIX. Quek, S., et al., Pattern of third molar impaction in a Singapore Chinese population: a retrospective radiographic survey. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2003. 32(5): p. 548-552.
XX. Svendsen, H. and J. Maertens, Etiology of third molar impaction. Textbook and color atlas of tooth impactions. Copenhagen: Munskgaard, 1997: p. 223-227.
XXI. Santosh, P., Impacted mandibular third molars: Review of literature and a proposal of a combined clinical and radiological classification. Annals of medical and health sciences research, 2015. 5(4): p. 229-234.
XXII. Pell, G.J., Impacted mandibular third molars: classification and modified techniques for removal. Dent Digest, 1933. 39: p. 330-338.
XXIII. Fielding, A., A. Douglass, and R. Whitley, Reasons for early removal of impacted third molars. Clinical preventive dentistry, 1981. 3(6): p. 19-23.
XXIV. Schersten, E., L. Lysell, and M. Rohlin, Prevalence of impacted third molars in dental students. Swedish dental journal, 1989. 13(1-2): p. 7-13.
XXV. Ventä, I., L. Turtola, and P. Ylipaavalniemi, Radiographic follow-up of impacted third molars from age 20 to 32 years. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2001. 30(1): p. 54-57.
XXVI. Eshghpour, M., et al., Pattern of mandibular third molar impaction: A cross‑sectional study in northeast of Iran. Nigerian journal of clinical practice, 2014. 17(6): p. 673-677.
XXVII. Hellman, M., Our third molar teeth, their eruption, presence and absence. Dent. Cosmos, 1936. 78: p. 750-762.
XXVIII. Padhye, M.N., et al., Pattern of mandibular third molar impaction in the Indian population: a retrospective clinico-radiographic survey. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 2013. 116(3): p. e161-e166.
XXIX. Hugoson, A. and C. Kugelberg, The prevalence of third molars in a Swedish population. An epidemiological study. Community dental health, 1988. 5(2): p. 121-138.
XXX. Yilmaz, S., et al., Assessment of third molar impaction pattern and associated clinical symptoms in a central anatolian turkish population. Medical Principles and Practice, 2016. 25(2): p. 169-175.
XXXI. Almendros-Marqués, N., L. Berini-Aytés, and C. Gay-Escoda, Influence of lower third molar position on the incidence of preoperative complications. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 2006. 102(6): p. 725-732.