Unraveling the Complexity of Peyronie's Disease: A Comprehensive Exploration

Main Article Content

Arturo Rojas Romero
José Manuel Pastrana Rosas
Gabriela Martinez Maya
Alejandra López Jiménez
Dania Ivone Rios Hernández
Arnold García Ledezma

Abstract

Peyronie's disease (PD) stands as a distinctive pathology within the realm of urology, presenting a multifaceted clinical panorama characterized by the development of fibrous plaques in the tunica albuginea of the penis. Named after the 18th-century French surgeon François Gigot de la Peyronie, this disorder engenders penile deformities, pain, and psychological distress, underscoring the need for a nuanced understanding and comprehensive management approach.


This article endeavors to provide an exhaustive exploration of PD, delving into its intricate etiology, pathophysiological underpinnings, clinical manifestations, and the far-reaching implications on psychosocial well-being. The disease's genesis intertwines genetic predispositions, microtrauma during sexual activity, and inflammatory responses, culminating in dysregulated wound healing processes marked by the excessive deposition of collagen.


From a clinical standpoint, PD transcends beyond its physical manifestations, adversely impacting patients' mental and emotional states. The altered penile morphology and compromised sexual function pose not only physical challenges but also unravel a complex tapestry of psychological consequences. As such, this article scrutinizes the dual facets of PD, advocating for a holistic approach that addresses both the physical and psychosocial dimensions of the disease.


Diagnostic modalities, ranging from clinical evaluation to imaging techniques, form a pivotal aspect of our discourse, providing clinicians with a comprehensive armamentarium for accurate and timely diagnosis. Moreover, an exhaustive review of treatment modalities, encompassing conservative measures, pharmacotherapy, and surgical interventions, aims to distill evidence-based insights guiding therapeutic decision-making.


This comprehensive analysis seeks to contribute substantively to the existing body of knowledge, fostering a deeper understanding of PD within the medical community. By amalgamating clinical insights with emerging research trends, this article endeavors to illuminate the path toward refined diagnostic strategies and novel therapeutic interventions, ultimately striving for improved patient outcomes and an elevated standard of care in the management of Peyronie's disease.

Article Details

How to Cite
Arturo Rojas Romero, José Manuel Pastrana Rosas, Gabriela Martinez Maya, Alejandra López Jiménez, Dania Ivone Rios Hernández, & Arnold García Ledezma. (2023). Unraveling the Complexity of Peyronie’s Disease: A Comprehensive Exploration. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies, 3(12), 3170–3175. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v3-i12-45
Section
Articles

References

I. Nehra A, Alterowitz R, Culkin DJ, Faraday MM, Hakim LS, Heidelbaugh JJ, et al. Peyronie’s disease: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2015;194:745-53.

II. Yafi FA, Pinsky MR, Sangkum P, Hellstrom WJ. Therapeutic advances in the treatment of Peyronie’s disease. Andrology. 2015;3:650-60.

III. Watanabe MS, Theodoro TR, Coelho NL, Mendes A, Leonel MLP, Mader AM, et al. Extracellular matrix alterations in the Peyronie’s disease. J Adv Res. 2017;8:455-61.

IV. Paulis G, Romano G, Paulis L, Barletta D. Recent pathophysiological aspects of Peyronie’s disease: role of free radicals, rationale, and therapeutic implications for antioxidant treatment-literature review. Adv Urol. 2017;2017:4653512.

V. Bjekic MD, Vlajinac HD, Sipetic SB, Marinkovic JM. Risk factors for Peyronie’s disease: a case-control study. BJU Int. 2006;97:570-4.

VI. Hatzimouratidis K, Eardley I, Giuliano F, Hatzichristou D, Moncada I, Salonia A, et al. EAU guidelines on penile curvature. Eur Urol. 2012;62:543-52.

VII. Sommer F, Schwarzer U, Wassmer G, Bloch W, Braun M, Klotz T, et al. Epidemiology of Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res. 2002;14:379-83.

VIII. Levine LA. Peyronie’s disease: a contemporary review of non-surgical treatment. Arab J Urol. 2013;11:278-83.

IX. Pryor J, Farell C. Controlled clinical trial of Vitamin E in Peyronie’s disease. Prog Reprod Biol. 1983;9:41-5.

X. Hellstrom WJ. Medical management of Peyronie’s disease. J Androl. 2009;30:397-405.

XI. Weidner W, Hauck EW, Schnitker J, Peyronie’s Disease Study Group of Andrological Group of German Urologists. Potassium paraaminobenzoate (POTABA) in the treatment of Peyronie’s disease: a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Eur Urol. 2005;47:530-5.

XII. Teloken C, Rhoden EL, Grazziotin TM, Ros CT, Sogari PR, Souto CA, et al. Tamoxifen versus placebo in the treatment of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 1999;162:2003-5.

Most read articles by the same author(s)