Translation and Validation of the Vietnamese Version of the Barriers Questionnaire II in Patients with Cancer

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Nov 9, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v3-i11-26
Keywords:
Patient , questionnaire reliability barriers cancer validity

Main Article Content

Son Dinh Vu
MSN, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vinh Phuc College, Vietnam.
Phuong Cam Pham
Assoc.Prof, Center for Nuclear Medicine and Oncology, Bach Mai Hospital, Vietnam.
Chinh Thi Minh Nguyen
Ph.D, Department for Training Management, Nam Dinh University of Nursing, Vietnam.
Thao Thi Phuong Trinh
BSN, Military Hospital 109, Vietnam.

Abstract

Background: The Barriers Questionnaire II (BQII) was developed to assess barriers to effective pain management.


Objective: This study aims to translate and validate the BQII into Vietnamese.


Method: The Viet-BQII was evaluated for content validity and reliability by 6 experts and 30 patients with cancer. The content validity of the questionnaire was measured by Item - content validity index and Scale - content validity index; the test-retest reliability was measured using Intra-Class Correlation; the internal consistency of the scale items was assessed by calculating Cronbach's α value.


Results: The Viet - BQII had a content validity in each question that ranges from 0.83 to 1.0, the content value for the scale was 0.92, Cronbach's α was 0.89, and the test-retest reliability with ICC was 0.82 (p <0.001).


Conclusions: The Viet-BQII ensures the validity and reliability for measuring patient barriers to pain management in patients with cancer in Vietnam.

Article Details

How to Cite
Vu, S. D. ., Pham, P. C. ., Nguyen, C. T. M. ., & Trinh, T. T. P. . (2023). Translation and Validation of the Vietnamese Version of the Barriers Questionnaire II in Patients with Cancer . International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies, 3(11), 2681–2688. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v3-i11-26
Issue
Vol. 3 No. 11 (2023): Volume 03 Issue 11 November 2023
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

I. Nguyen, D.B et al. (2009), Ung thư học đại cương, Nhà xuất bản Giáo dục Việt Nam, Hà Nội.

II. Long, N.H. (2021). Measurement tools in nursing research and health sciences. Medicine Publishing House, Hanoi.

III. Vu, SD et al (2021), "Palliative care needs of patients with cancer at the CenterOncology, Thai Nguyen Central Hospital and some related factors", Nursing Science. 5(2), pp. 31-40.

IV. Hartrick, C. T., Kovan, J. P., & Shapiro, S. (2003). The numeric rating scale for clinical pain measurement: A ratio measure? Pain Practice, 3(4), 310-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-7085.2003.03034.x

V. American Cancer Society. Managing, Cancer Pain at Home. https://www at.cancer.org/treatment/treatments-and-side-effects/physical-sideeffects/pain /pain.html.

VI. Campos, D. R. D., Paiva, C. E., Brandão, A. P. M. S., Ameringer, S., & Paiva, B. S. R. (2021). Validation of the Adolescent Barriers Questionnaire for use in Brazilian adolescents with cancer. Jornal de Pediatria, 97, 348-353.

VII. Cristobal, E., Flavian, C., & Guinaliu, M. (2007). Perceived e‐service quality (PeSQ) measurement validation and effects on consumer satisfaction and website loyalty. Managing service quality: An international journal, 17(3), 317-340.

VIII. Ferrell, B. R., & Paice, J. A. (Eds.). (2019). Oxford textbook of palliative nursing. Oxford University Press.

IX. Gunnarsdottir, S., Donovan, H. S., Serlin, R. C., Voge, C., & Ward, S. (2002). Patient-related barriers to pain management: the Barriers Questionnaire II (BQ-II). Pain, 99(3), 385-396.

X. Jacobsen, R., Møldrup, C., Christrup, L., Sjøgren, P., & Hansen, O. B. (2009). The Danish Barriers Questionnaire‐II: Preliminary Validation in Cancer Pain Patients. Pain Practice, 9(4), 266-274.

XI. Koller, A., & Jahn, P. (2018). Developing a short form of the German barriers questionnaire II: a validation study in four steps. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 55(2), 458-467.

XII. Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155-163.

XIII. Lenz, E. R. (2010). Measurement in nursing and health research. Springer Publishing Company.

XIV. McCracken, L. M. (1998). Learning to live with the pain: acceptance of pain predicts adjustment in persons with chronic pain. Pain, 74(1), 21-27.

XV. Sakakibara, N., Komatsu, H., Takahashi, M., Yamauchi, H., Yamauchi, T., & Doorenbos, A. Z. (2020). Validation of the Japanese version of the barriers questionnaire II in cancer pain management: a cross-sectional study. BMC Palliative Care, 19, 1-9.

XVI. Sholjakova, M., Durnev, V., Kartalov, A., & Kuzmanovska, B. (2018). Pain relief is an integral part of palliative care. Open access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 6(4), 739.

XVII. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55. Retrieved from https.

XVIII. Triandis, H. C., & Brislin, R. W. (1984). Cross-cultural psychology. American psychologist, 39(9), 1006.

XIX. Turk, D. C. (1990). Customizing treatment for chronic pain patients: who, what, and why. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 6(4), 255-270.

XX. Turk, D. C. (1990). Customizing treatment for chronic pain patients: who, what, and why. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 6(4), 255-270.

XXI. Ward, S. E., Goldberg, N., Miller-McCauley, V., Mueller, C., Nolan, A., Pawlik-Plank, D., ... & Weissman, D. E. (1993). Patient-related barriers to management of cancer pain. Pain, 52(3), 319-324.