An Updated View of Breast Reconstruction

Main Article Content

Yuri Jiménez Caprielova
Kenia Selene Avilés Palomares
Dr. Juan Carlos Hernández Torón

Abstract

Breast reconstruction is a cornerstone of post-mastectomy care, aiming to restore the breast’s form and appearance while enhancing patients’ psychosocial well-being. The procedure can be performed using implant-based or autologous tissue techniques, each tailored to the patient’s medical profile, treatment plan, and preferences. Implant-based reconstruction, involving saline or silicone implants, offers shorter recovery times and is often preferred in patients without planned postmastectomy radiation therapy. Autologous tissue reconstruction, including techniques like the DIEP and latissimus dorsi flaps, provides natural contours and greater durability, particularly beneficial for patients undergoing radiation therapy. Advancements such as nipple-sparing mastectomy, acellular dermal matrices, and minimally invasive approaches have improved surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction. However, complications—ranging from implant-related issues like capsular contracture to donor-site morbidity—highlight the need for comprehensive preoperative planning and a multidisciplinary approach. Breast reconstruction remains a highly individualized process, emphasizing patient-centered care to optimize oncological safety, aesthetic outcomes, and quality of life.

Article Details

How to Cite
Yuri Jiménez Caprielova, Kenia Selene Avilés Palomares, & Dr. Juan Carlos Hernández Torón. (2024). An Updated View of Breast Reconstruction. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies, 4(12), 2359–2364. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v4-i12-42
Section
Articles

References

I. Invasive Breast Cancer. Carlson RW, Allred DC, Anderson BO, et al. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network: JNCCN. 2011;9(2):136-222. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2011.0016. Leading Journal

II. Update on Breast Reconstruction Techniques and Indications. Petit JY, Rietjens M, Lohsiriwat V, et al. World Journal of Surgery. 2012;36(7):1486-97. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1486-3.

III. Breast Reconstruction. Sbitany H. The Surgical Clinics of North America. 2018;98(4):845-857. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2018.03.011.

IV. Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy. Tondu T, Tjalma WAA, Thiessen FEF. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology. 2018;230:228-232. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.04.016.

V. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging After Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction. Heller SL, Lourenco AP, Niell BL, et al. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR. 2020;17(11S):S403-S414. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2020.09.009.

VI. Breast Reconstruction With Prosthetic Implants. Mesbahi AN, McCarthy CM, Disa JJ. Cancer Journal (Sudbury, Mass.). 2008 Jul-Aug;14(4):230-5. doi:10.1097/PPO.0b013e31817fb7c3.

VII. Breast Reconstruction Following Cancer Treatment. Gerber B, Marx M, Untch M, Faridi A. Deutsches Arzteblatt International. 2015;112(35-36):593-600. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2015.0593.

VIII. Invasive Breast Cancer. Carlson RW, Allred DC, Anderson BO, et al. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN. 2011;9(2):136-222. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2011.0016.

IX. Breast Reconstruction Options Following Mastectomy. Djohan R, Gage E, Bernard S. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 2008;75 Suppl 1:S17-23. doi:10.3949/ccjm.75.suppl_1.s17.

X. Update on Breast Reconstruction Techniques and Indications. Petit JY, Rietjens M, Lohsiriwat V, et al. World Journal of Surgery. 2012;36(7):1486-97. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1486-3.

XI. Current Trends in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction. Panchal H, Matros E. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2017;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):7S-13S. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000003941.

XII. Complications After Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer: A Claims-Based Analysis. Jagsi R, Jiang J, Momoh AO, et al. Annals of Surgery. 2016;263(2):219-27. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001177.

XIII. Impact of Radiotherapy on Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast Reconstruction. Jagsi R, Momoh AO, Qi J, et al. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2018;110(2). doi:10.1093/jnci/djx148.

XIV. Single-Institution Algorithm for Prevention and Management of Complications in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction. Yin Z, Wang H, Liu Y, et al. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2022;150:48S-60S. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000009490.

XV. Irradiated Autologous Breast Reconstructions: Effects of Patient Factors and Treatment Variables. Albino FP, Koltz PF, Ling MN, Langstein HN. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2010;126(1):12-16. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181da878f.

XVI. Breast Reconstruction Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Predictors of Complications, Reconstruction Outcomes, and 5-Year Trends. Colwell AS, Tessler O, Lin AM, et al. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2014;133(3):496-506. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000438056.67375.75.

XVII. Complications in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: One-Year Outcomes of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium (MROC) Study. Wilkins EG, Hamill JB, Kim HM, et al. Annals of Surgery. 2018;267(1):164-170. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002033.

XVIII. Latissimus Dorsi Flap for Breast Reconstruction: A Large Single-Institution Evaluation of Surgical Outcome and Complications. Banys-Paluchowski M, Brus L, Krawczyk N, et al. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2024;309(1):269-280. doi:10.1007/s00404-023-07186-3.

XIX. Comparison of Different Techniques in Latissimus Dorsi Breast Reconstruction: Plain, Immediately Lipofilled, and Implant Enhanced. Palve J, Luukkaala T, Kääriäinen M. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2022;88(1):20-24. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000002798.

XX. Immediate Latissimus Dorsi and Prosthetic Reconstruction in the Setting of Postmastectomy Radiation: An Analysis of 376 Breast Reconstructions. Chiasson KF, Kumbla PA, Restrepo RD, Soto E, Cohn AB. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2020;84(6S Suppl 5):S364-S368. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000002279.

XXI. Long-Term Outcomes of Latissimus Dorsi Flap Breast Reconstructions: A Single-Centre Observational Cohort Study With Up to 12 Years of Follow Up. Wattoo G, Nayak S, Khan S, et al. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery : JPRAS. 2021;74(9):2202-2209. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2020.12.058.

XXII. A Retrospective Study of Latissimus Dorsi Flap in Immediate Breast Reconstruction. Zheng H, Zhu G, Guan Q, et al. Frontiers in Oncology. 2021;11:598604. doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.598604.

XXIII. Donor-Site Morbidity Following Breast Reconstruction With a Latissimus Dorsi Flap - A Prospective Study. Højvig JH, Henriksen M, Bartholdy CR, Bonde CT. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery : JPRAS. 2022;75(7):2205-2210. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2022.01.036.

XXIV. Breast Reconstruction Using the Latissimus Dorsi Flap and Immediate Fat Transfer (LIFT): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Escandón JM, Escandón L, Ahmed A, et al. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery : JPRAS. 2022;75(11):4106-4116. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2022.08.025.

XXV. Staged Mastopexy Before Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Improving Safety and Appearance in Breast Reconstruction. Awaida CJ, Bernier C, Bou-Merhi JS, et al. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2024;153(5):864e-872e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000010823.

XXVI. The Role of Premastectomy Mastopexy and Breast Reduction in the Reconstruction of the Enlarged or Ptotic Breast. Hammond DC, Little AK. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2022;150(2):270-280. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000009340.

XXVII. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging of Deep Inferior Epigastric Arteries for Surgical Planning (Breast Reconstruction Surgery): 2022 Update. Singh N, Aghayev A, Ahmad S, et al. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR. 2022;19(11S):S357-S363. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.004.

XXVIII. Minimally Invasive Laparoscopically Dissected Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap: An Anatomical Feasibility Study and a First Clinical Case. Hivelin M, Soprani A, Schaffer N, Hans S, Lantieri L. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2018;141(1):33-39. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000003989.

XXIX. Robotic Harvest of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap for Breast Reconstruction: A Case Series. Bishop SN, Asaad M, Liu J, et al. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2022;149(5):1073-1077. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000008988.

XXX. Robotic DIEP Flap Harvest Through a Totally Extraperitoneal Approach Using a Single-Port Surgical Robotic System. Choi JH, Song SY, Park HS, et al. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2021;148(2):304-307. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000008181.

XXXI. Short Fasciotomy-Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Harvest for Breast Reconstruction. Kim J, Lee KT, Mun GH. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2023;152(6):972e-984e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000010382.

XXXII. Breast Reconstruction With the TRAM Flap: Pedicled and Free. Serletti JM. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2006;94(6):532-7. doi:10.1002/jso.20492.

XXXIII. Optimizing Pedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Muscle Flap Breast Reconstruction. Kanchwala SK, Bucky LP. Cancer Journal (Sudbury, Mass.). 2008 Jul-Aug;14(4):236-40. doi:10.1097/PPO.0b013e318180bce5.

XXXIV. Choice of Flaps for Breast Reconstruction. Tachi M, Yamada A. International Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2005;10(5):289-97. doi:10.1007/s10147-005-0527-4.

XXXV. A Comparison Study of Deep Muscle Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap for Breast Reconstruction. Tokumoto H, Akita S, Arai M, et al. Microsurgery. 2019;39(7):583-589. doi:10.1002/micr.30443.

XXXVI. Muscle Sparing-2 Transverse Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap for Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison With Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap. Takeishi M, Fujimoto M, Ishida K, Makino Y. Microsurgery. 2008;28(8):650-5. doi:10.1002/micr.20563.

XXXVII. A Safe and Efficient Technique for Pedicled TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction. Semple JL, Viezel-Mathieu A, Alshaqsi S, Armstrong K. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2023;151(6):1022e-1034e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000010174.